Cannabis Group Drops Equity Licensing Suit Against LA
Cannabis Group Drops Equity Licensing Suit Against LA
Licensing

Cannabis Group Drops Social Equity Licensing Bias Suit Against Los Angeles

Cannabis Group Drops Equity Licensing Suit Against LA
Licensing

Cannabis Group Drops Social Equity Licensing Bias Suit Against Los Angeles

PUBLISHED
Aug 25, 2021
read time 1 MIN
SPRED IT

Three unsuccessful social equity applicants —ARMLA One, ARMLA Two, and Gompers SocEq— withdrew their year-old federal lawsuit against Los Angeles. The three applicants, with common ownership, alleged the city’s licensing decisions were biased.

ARMLA One had a winning application revoked because a preschool was within 700 feet of the planned marijuana store. Using the “what-about-ism” defense, they argued that several other license winners also were in violation of being too close to schools or libraries.

The group also introduced additional legal arguments, such as a claim that by erecting barriers for out-of-state companies the city’s social equity program violates the U.S. Constitution. By adding legal arguments that weren’t part of the original lawsuit, Los Angeles officials later accused the group of an “endless game of whack-a-mole.”

According to the filing, each side will pay its own legal costs.

SPRED IT
Join The Conversation
{
0 comments
}

Got a tip for the team? We'd like to hear it!
Email:

*All comments are moderated before being published


TAGS
Armla one
Armla two
Business
California
Gompers soceq
Laws
Licensing
Los angeles
Marijuana companies
Social equity
State by state
Top Articles
Explore More >
Explore More >